State of Utah v. K.O., 2010 UT App. 155, (Utah Court of Appeals June 17, 2010).
K.O. appeals his conviction of burglary of a vehicle because of insufficient evidence; second, because the Juvenile Court failed to hold a reliability hearing before admitting eyewitness testimony; third, because the court failed to exclude hearsay evidence.
The Court of Appeals concluded that the eyewitness testimony combined with the testimony of K.O.’s conduct of attempting to avoid police detection was sufficient to uphold his conviction. Second, because reliability hearing is to protect the jury from hearing unreliable testimony it is only helpful in jury trials. A judge has an opportunity to evaluate the reliability of the eyewitness at the time of trial. Finally, the Court concluded that the testimony of the arresting officer was not hearsay because the officer (declarant) was available for cross examination and under Utah Rules of Evidence 801(d), such evidence is not hearsay.
No comments:
Post a Comment